Imposition of carbon tax on developing countries unfair: CEA V Anantha
Chief Economic Adviser V Anantha Nageswaran said measures like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), taken by developed nations to combat climate change, are unfair towards developing economies.
Chief Economic Adviser V Anantha Nageswaran on Thursday said measures like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), taken by developed nations to combat climate change, are unfair towards developing economies.
The European Union has decided to impose carbon tax (CBAM) on products from certain sectors like steel, cement from countries like India and China.
The carbon tax will come into effect from January 1, 2026. During the trial period, which started on October 1, 2023, companies from seven carbon-intensive sectors, including steel, cement, fertiliser, aluminium and hydrocarbon products, have to share emissions data with the EU.
"By taking actions against climate change, developing countries are also ensuring lives and properties of the people and businesses in the developed world...If so, what is the premium they are getting in return for taking action on their part to ensure the economic activity in the developed world?" Nageswaran wondered.
"Obviously, the kind of premium that the developed world is contemplating paying to the developing world cannot be Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. It has to be something more positive than that," he said at the Regional Workshop on Climate Finance organised jointly by Department of Economic Affairs and Asian Development Bank.
The carbon tax by the EU may affect the profitability of Indian exporters as Europe is among the top import destinations for India.
The country's total trade with the EU was USD 134.71 billion in 2022-23, with imports worth USD 59.87 billion and exports at USD 74.84 billion.
From developing countries' perspective, he said, the best insurance against climate change is continued economic growth.
The world faces a recurring set of hazards, including through climate change, that repeatedly put its people and businesses at high risk of lost assets, health, livelihoods, or even lives.
Countries often fail to tap well-proven financial coping mechanisms, such as insurance schemes, that could boost resilience against such hazards.
Governments and the most vulnerable thus repeatedly and often alone bear the unpredictable and onerous costs of disaster, contributing to financial instability, as per the background note prepared for the workshop.
In 2022, global economic losses from disasters due to natural hazards amounted to USD 275 billion. At USD 125 billion, insured losses covered 45 per cent of the damage, it said.
Over the past decade, annual global insured catastrophe losses accounted for an average of USD 100 billion peaking in 2017 with a payout of more than USD 154 billion, it added.
Get Latest Business News, Stock Market Updates and Videos; Check your tax outgo through Income Tax Calculator and save money through our Personal Finance coverage. Check Business Breaking News Live on Zee Business Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe on YouTube.
RECOMMENDED STORIES
Rs 3,500 Monthly SIP for 35 years vs Rs 35,000 Monthly SIP for 16 Years: Which can give you higher corpus in long term? See calculations
Power of Compounding: How long it will take to build Rs 5 crore corpus with Rs 5,000, Rs 10,000 and Rs 15,000 monthly investments?
SBI 444-day FD vs PNB 400-day FD: Here's what general and senior citizens will get in maturity on Rs 3.5 lakh and 7 lakh investments in special FDs?
SCSS vs FD: Which guaranteed return scheme will give you more quarterly income on Rs 20,00,000 investment?
02:31 PM IST