Twitter users shared more fake news during 2016 US election
The findings led by researchers from Oxford University showed that users of Twitter shared more polarising political news and information than users elsewhere.
Key highlights:
- Twitter users in the US shared more polarising political news and conspiratorial content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources, during the 2016 presidential election
- Users of the micro-blogging site in some states, shared more polarising political news and information than users elsewhere
- This content uses divisive and inflammatory rhetoric, and presents faulty reasoning
Twitter users in the US shared more polarising political news and conspiratorial content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources, during the 2016 presidential election, finds a study.
The findings led by researchers from Oxford University, showed that users of the micro-blogging site in some states, shared more polarising political news and information than users elsewhere.
This content uses divisive and inflammatory rhetoric, and presents faulty reasoning or misleading information to manipulate the readers` understanding of public issues and feed conspiracy theories.
Kentucky, South Dakota, Delaware, Montana and West Virginia had the highest levels of junk news shared, while North Dakota, Washington D.C., Iowa, New York and Wyoming had the least.
Further, the average levels of this low quality political information was more concentrated in swing states than in uncontested states.
While the social media users shared a lot of political content, the amount of professionally researched political news and information was consistently smaller than the amount of extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, fake news and other forms of junk news.
Thus, not only did such junk news "outperform" real news, but the proportion of professional news content being shared hit its lowest point the day before the election, Philip N. Howard from the varsity said in a statement.
For the study, the team analysed a dataset of 22,117,221 tweets collected between November 1 to 11, 2016, that contained hashtags related to politics and the election.
Within our initial sample, approximately 7,083,691 tweets, 32 per cent of the total traffic, were coming from users who volunteered enough location information in their profile to determine which state they were in.
ALSO READ:
Get Latest Business News, Stock Market Updates and Videos; Check your tax outgo through Income Tax Calculator and save money through our Personal Finance coverage. Check Business Breaking News Live on Zee Business Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe on YouTube.
RECOMMENDED STORIES
Small SIP, Big Impact: Rs 1,111 monthly SIP for 40 years, Rs 11,111 for 20 years or Rs 22,222 for 10 years, which do you think works best?
Power of Compounding: How long it will take to build Rs 5 crore corpus with Rs 5,000, Rs 10,000 and Rs 15,000 monthly investments?
SBI 444-day FD vs PNB 400-day FD: Here's what general and senior citizens will get in maturity on Rs 3.5 lakh and 7 lakh investments in special FDs?
Rs 3,500 Monthly SIP for 35 years vs Rs 35,000 Monthly SIP for 16 Years: Which can give you higher corpus in long term? See calculations
12:02 PM IST