Prevailing rules on mandatory insurance cover, helmets for 2-wheelers extend to EVs: Delhi HC
A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said that insurance coverage, wearing helmets or protective gear, registration, and penal provisions in the law apply to electric vehicles, just as they do to other vehicles.
The Delhi High Court on Thursday clarified that provisions under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, are applicable to electric vehicles (EVs).
A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said that insurance coverage, wearing helmets or protective gear, registration, and penal provisions in the law apply to electric vehicles, just as they do to other vehicles.
The bench was dealing with a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to make insurance coverage compulsory for all electric vehicles, especially two-wheelers and three-wheelers, before they are delivered to the owners.
The court said that according to Section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, read with Rule 2(u) of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, all EVs or battery-operated vehicles are considered "motor vehicles" under the law.
Therefore, they are subject to the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, including mandatory insurance, registration, and the requirement to wear protective gear."
All the provisions under the MV Act and the CMV Rules pertaining to requirement of registration, mandatory insurance cover, wearing of protective headgear, penal provisions etc. are applicable to EVs," it said.
The court also noted that the Centre has already established standards for batteries used in electric vehicles.
While dismissing the PIL, the court criticised the petitioner for filing a frivolous petition and advised exercising more diligence and restraint before filing such cases in the future.
"Had there been some due diligence exercised and research done on the part of the petitioner, it would have been apparent that the issues raised by the petitioner in the instant PIL have already been addressed through relevant statutes, rules and notifications.
"Such frivolous PILs instead of enabling access to justice, actually hinder it by wasting precious judicial time," the court said.
It also directed the Delhi government to continue to ensure that the subsidy offered by it for electric vehicles registered in the national capital are being duly disbursed in a timely manner.
Get Latest Business News, Stock Market Updates and Videos; Check your tax outgo through Income Tax Calculator and save money through our Personal Finance coverage. Check Business Breaking News Live on Zee Business Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe on YouTube.
RECOMMENDED STORIES
Looking for short term investment ideas? Analysts suggest buying these 2 stocks for potential gain; check targets
SBI 444-day FD vs PNB 400-day FD: Here's what general and senior citizens will get in maturity on Rs 3.5 lakh and 7 lakh investments in special FDs?
Power of Compounding: How long it will take to build Rs 5 crore corpus with Rs 5,000, Rs 10,000 and Rs 15,000 monthly investments?
SCSS vs FD: Which guaranteed return scheme will give you more quarterly income on Rs 20,00,000 investment?
Small SIP, Big Impact: Rs 1,111 monthly SIP for 40 years, Rs 11,111 for 20 years or Rs 22,222 for 10 years, which do you think works best?
08:15 PM IST