Rules say we need Mallya to appear before Supreme Court: Attorney General
The Supreme Court trial for hearing the banks’ plea against Vijay Mallya concluded with the attorney general, Mukul Rohtagi, appearing for the banks, saying that the businessman has breached court order by not appearing in front of it.
The Attorney General of India Mukul Rohtagi said that the Supreme Court rules require personal appearance of Mallya in court.
The apex court has scheduled the next hearing of the banks' plea for September 27.
Vijay Mallya, is held in contempt of court for not completely disclosing the location of his assets to the consortium of banks. In April, the apex court ordered Mallya to disclose the assets of him and his family, but a later plea filed by the State Bank of India stated that the details disclosed by Mallya were incomplete and vague.
Ex-owner of Kingfisher Airlines, who left India in March is currently living in the UK, owes 17 banks, including the State Bank of India, over Rs. 9,000 crore with interest.
Get Latest Business News, Stock Market Updates and Videos; Check your tax outgo through Income Tax Calculator and save money through our Personal Finance coverage. Check Business Breaking News Live on Zee Business Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe on YouTube.
RECOMMENDED STORIES
Looking for short term investment ideas? Analysts suggest buying these 2 stocks for potential gain; check targets
SBI 444-day FD vs PNB 400-day FD: Here's what general and senior citizens will get in maturity on Rs 3.5 lakh and 7 lakh investments in special FDs?
SCSS vs FD: Which guaranteed return scheme will give you more quarterly income on Rs 20,00,000 investment?
Small SIP, Big Impact: Rs 1,111 monthly SIP for 40 years, Rs 11,111 for 20 years or Rs 22,222 for 10 years, which do you think works best?
Rs 3,500 Monthly SIP for 35 years vs Rs 35,000 Monthly SIP for 16 Years: Which can give you higher corpus in long term? See calculations
12:21 PM IST