Big setback to Yes Bank: Allahabad HC says won’t interfere in investigation
In a big setback to Yes Bank, the Allahabad High Court has refused to intervene in the case related to freezing of DishTV shares by the Gautam Budh Nagar police which have been mortgaged with Yes Bank. What did the High Court said in its order and what does it mean; all decided here: TOP POINTS
Allahabad HC refused to interfere in a criminal investigation being carried out by Crime Branch of Gautam Buddh Nagar Police of Uttar Pradesh. Bench of Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Justice Subhash Vidyarthi wrote in its order that, “We are of the opinion that the writ jurisdiction should not be exercised to stifle the legitimate investigation. It is well settled that the High Court should normally refrain from giving prima facie decision, in case, where the entire facts are incomplete and hazy, more so, when the evidence has not been collected and produced before the Court.”
See Zee Business Live TV Streaming Below:
HC further noted in its order that “ The issues involved whether factual or legal are of magnitude and cannot be seen in their true perspective without sufficient material. In the present matter, we lack sufficient material. Therefore, we are of the opinion that disputed facts cannot be examined under Article 226 of Constitution of India and once efficacious statutory remedy is available to the petitioner against the notice impugned, then we decline to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is dismissed on the ground of availability of statutory remedy”.
Crime Branch had issued notice on Nov 5, 2021 to Yes Bank and NSDL for freezing the shares of Dish TV, shares were pledged to the bank and later invoked by the lender. Yes Bank had challenged the freezing of shares by Crime Branch in Allahabad HC, where bank pleaded that it has to exercise its voting rights in general body meeting to be held on November 30.
During HC, prosecution labeled serious allegations of misleading by Yes Bank to the high court using manufactured documents. Prosecution also blasted the plea of Yes Bank seeking quashing of FIR, by asking when the Bank is not made an accused in the case, then on what basis, quashing is sought by Yes Bank.
Prosecution also told to the court that freezing of the shares by crime branch is based on 1.5 years of serious investigation into the various aspects of the case.
Dr Subhash Chandra, Mentor of Essel Group had filed a criminal complaint with the Gautam Buddh Nagar Police , where in he alleged that a conspiracy was hatched by Rana Kapoor, former Chairman and CEO of Yes Bank, Venugopal Dhoot, Former CMD of Videocon Group and others to cause loss by forcing for merger of Videocon D2H with Dish TV. He alleged that Kapoor forced this deal so that the proceeds of the same can be transferred to Videocon and later to Yes Bank, as Videocon Group loans were on the verge of tagged as NPA. He alleged that Kapoor has threatened if the deal is not done, then, he will recall all the loans given to the Essel Group companies.
Get Latest Business News, Stock Market Updates and Videos; Check your tax outgo through Income Tax Calculator and save money through our Personal Finance coverage. Check Business Breaking News Live on Zee Business Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe on YouTube.
RECOMMENDED STORIES
SCSS vs FD: Which guaranteed return scheme will give you more quarterly income on Rs 20,00,000 investment?
Power of Compounding: How long it will take to build Rs 5 crore corpus with Rs 5,000, Rs 10,000 and Rs 15,000 monthly investments?
SBI 444-day FD vs PNB 400-day FD: Here's what general and senior citizens will get in maturity on Rs 3.5 lakh and 7 lakh investments in special FDs?
Small SIP, Big Impact: Rs 1,111 monthly SIP for 40 years, Rs 11,111 for 20 years or Rs 22,222 for 10 years, which do you think works best?
07:49 PM IST